I’m positive you’re conscious of the huge disaster we’ve got with kids beneath 5 dropping sick like flies from COVID, as that is the justification Pfizer is utilizing to get an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) to allow them to jab these defenseless and harmless kids. No? Me, neither.
Regardless of conclusive proof that younger kids have nearly no danger of extreme problems or dying from COVID-19, Pfizer is hustling to get our infants and toddlers injected with their experimental gene switch know-how.
February 1, 2022, Pfizer/BioNTech requested the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration to grant emergency use authorization (EUA) for his or her COVID shot to infants and kids aged 6 months by way of 4 years.1,2,3
In mid-December 2021, Pfizer admitted that two injections, at one-tenth the grownup dose, failed to supply an enough immune response in 2- to 4-year-olds. They’re now experimenting to see if three doses will produce enough ends in that age group. Within the meantime, the EUA might be for a two-dose routine, with the potential for extending it to a 3rd dose.
As reported by The New York Instances,4 had been Pfizer to attend till the triple-dose experiment is accomplished, the EUA request wouldn’t be potential till late March 2022, and federal officers are reportedly “anxious to start a vaccination program for the youngest kids as a result of the research confirmed there have been no security considerations with two doses.”
In different phrases, they apparently don’t care whether or not the photographs are efficient or not. They declare the photographs are “secure,” so it’s OK to inject younger kids though they may not achieve any profit. Does that make any sense?
In line with MSN:5
“[Pfizer] and its accomplice BioNTech stated that the submission was on the request of the FDA, which is an uncommon transfer. Rapidly after the announcement, the FDA scheduled a gathering of its vaccine advisory committee for Feb. 15 to debate the appliance.
Permitting Pfizer to submit the request now signifies that, if licensed, ‘dad and mom may have the chance to start a COVID-19 vaccination collection for his or her kids whereas awaiting potential authorization of a 3rd dose,’ in response to Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla. Knowledge on the third dose might be submitted to the FDA ‘within the coming months,’ the corporate stated.”
COVID Pictures Proven to Destroy Immune Operate
The listing of considerations is a protracted one. We’ve already seen that Pfizer’s personal knowledge reveal there are severe issues with the photographs, and real-world knowledge confirming worst fears are mounting by the day.
Various medical consultants, scientists and printed research have warned the COVID photographs can reprogram your immune system to reply in a dysfunctional method. For instance, a examine6 posted on the preprint server medRxiv, Could 6, 2021, discovered the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID jab “reprograms each adaptive and innate immune responses,” inflicting immune depletion.
Whereas the jab “induced efficient humoral and mobile immunity towards a number of SARS-CoV-2 variants,” the shot “additionally modulated the manufacturing of inflammatory cytokines by innate immune cells upon stimulation with each particular (SARS-CoV-2) and nonspecific (viral, fungal and bacterial) stimuli.”
Individuals who had been “absolutely vaccinated,” having acquired two doses of the Pfizer shot, additionally produced considerably much less interferon upon stimulation, which hampers vitally necessary innate immune responses.
In different phrases, we’re a horrible tradeoff. You could get some safety towards SARS-CoV-2 and its variants, however you’re weakening your total immune perform, which opens the door broad to all kinds of different well being issues, from bacterial, fungal and viral infections to most cancers and autoimmunity.
Is it actually clever to show infants and toddlers to such dangers? Simply because kids aren’t dying inside a couple of weeks of the shot doesn’t imply it’s innocent and due to this fact secure to make use of. Many of the harm from these jabs will emerge far down the highway, lengthy after they’ve gotten the shot.
The FDA is absolutely behaving in an irresponsible and negligent method, placing each baby in America in hurt’s approach in the long run — and for no purpose in any respect, since they know very properly two doses gained’t work in 2- to 4-year-olds, and so they don’t know if three doses will do the trick.
Pfizer Knowledge Strengthen Security Issues
Pfizer’s personal trial knowledge,7 that are beginning to be launched in response to a Freedom of Data Act (FOIA) request to the FDA, additionally do nothing to assuage security considerations. Fairly the opposite. Cumulatively, between December 1, 2020, and February 28, 2021 — a interval of simply 2.5 months — Pfizer acquired 42,086 harm stories, together with 1,223 fatalities.
Evaluate that to the 1976 swine flu vaccine, which was pulled after 25 deaths. Pfizer even acknowledges the irregular fee of accidents. They really needed to rent extra knowledge entry and case processing personnel to deal with the inflow of adversarial occasions stories. Nonetheless, they insist every part is hunky-dory and there’s completely no drawback.
Initially, the FDA needed 55 years to launch all of Pfizer’s trial knowledge at a fee of 500 pages monthly. After discovering one other trove of associated paperwork, they requested for 75 years. A choose denied each requests, ordering the company to launch the info at a fee of 55,000 pages monthly, beginning March 1, 2022, to finalize the total launch in about eight months.8
Judging by what we discovered within the preliminary 500-page batch launched in November 2021, it’s no surprise the FDA needed sufficient time to verify all culpable events could be useless and buried earlier than the total fact of their malfeasance got here out. If all goes properly, we must always have all that proof by September 2022.
Pfizer Intervenes in FOIA Lawsuit
There’s yet one more wrinkle within the FOIA lawsuit towards the FDA, although. Pfizer is now pushing to intervene within the case. Pfizer says it needs to “assist” the FDA with the redaction of the documentation, claiming it accommodates commerce secrets and techniques and proprietary data that have to be protected and is perhaps inappropriately disclosed if rushed.9,10 January 26, 2022, Reuters reported:11
“Pfizer Inc. needs to intervene in a Texas federal lawsuit in search of data from the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration utilized in licensing the corporate’s COVID-19 vaccine, a litigation transfer that plaintiffs who’re suing for the info say is untimely.
Pfizer’s legal professionals at DLA Piper instructed U.S. District Decide Mark Pittman on Jan. 21 it needed a task within the proceedings to assist the FDA keep away from ‘inappropriately’ disclosing commerce secret and confidential business data …
The group of medical doctors and scientists who sued final yr over public entry to the FDA’s Pfizer licensing data stated in a court docket submitting that the corporate’s bid to leap into the lawsuit was premature as a result of the plaintiffs haven’t challenged any redactions to requested data.”
The Defender additional reported:12
“The FDA claimed Pfizer is entitled to intervene within the case and the method of redacting the paperwork in query, because of the “Commerce Secrets and techniques Act,” signed into legislation by President Obama in 2016, stating:
‘FDA anticipates that coordination with Pfizer to acquire the corporate’s views as to which parts of the data are topic to Exemption 4, the Commerce Secrets and techniques Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1905, or different statutory protections might be a obligatory element of the company’s endeavors to fulfill the extraordinary exigencies of this case.’
Nonetheless, in response to The Gateway Pundit, the Commerce Secrets and techniques Act is being misinterpreted by the FDA and Pfizer: ‘[T]he protections supplied beneath that legislation enable for an proprietor of a commerce secret to sue in federal court docket when its commerce secrets and techniques have been misappropriated and doesn’t even indicate that an organization might intervene in a public data request by way of the FOIA.’
[Aaron] Siri [of the Siri & Glimstad law firm] additionally questioned the FDA’s dedication to transparency and hinted at a cover-up, stating: ‘The Courtroom is, apart from Congress, the one verify on the FDA …
It’s comprehensible that the FDA doesn’t need impartial scientists to assessment the paperwork it relied upon to license Pfizer’s vaccine on condition that it isn’t as efficient because the FDA initially claimed, doesn’t stop transmission, doesn’t stop towards sure rising variants, may cause severe coronary heart irritation in youthful people, and has quite a few different undisputed issues of safety.’
Siri stated the FDA’s ‘potential embarrassment’ over its determination to license the Pfizer vaccine should take a again seat to the transparency demanded by FOIA and ‘the pressing want and pursuits of the American individuals to assessment that licensure knowledge.’”
‘The Reality About Pfizer’
The British “Dispatches” documentary above, “Vaccine Wars: The Reality About Pfizer,” evaluations quite a few points regarding Pfizer’s dealing with of the COVID pandemic, together with its “struggle profiteering” (specializing in income throughout a pandemic) and spreading deceptive claims about its opponents, a whistleblower’s claims of scientific misconduct, and questions on Pfizer “taking part in God” by unilaterally dictating who would get its jab and who wouldn’t, thereby prolonging the pandemic.
In line with the Dispatches report, Pfizer’s jab was not solely costlier than its rival AstraZeneca to start with, costing the U.Ok. authorities £18 per dose in comparison with £3 for AstraZeneca, however as a 3rd booster dose rolled out, Pfizer raised its worth to £22, a choice that has raised questions concerning the firm’s motives. It appears pretty apparent that it’s all concerning the cash for them.
Pfizer will, after all, disagree with that apparent conclusion. In line with professor Sir Andrew Pollard, who helped develop the Pfizer shot, the corporate’s incentive was by no means about maximizing income. U.S. Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky, then again, instructed Dispatches that Pfizer clearly made no effort to rein of their pricing or restrict their income.
In line with Dispatches, Pfizer’s COVID jab has grow to be probably the most worthwhile pharmaceutical product the world has ever seen. As of the third quarter of 2021, Pfizer’s revenues had been 130% above operational prices, with COVID jab income for 2021 reaching $36 billion. Income from the jab is predicted to rise to $55 billion in 2022 — equal to the gross home product (GDP) of Croatia.
One of many causes for Pfizer’s record-breaking income, Dispatches says, is as a result of it has been prioritizing gross sales to wealthier Western nations prepared and in a position to pay the upper price. Pfizer has additionally refused to license its patented recipe to make sure an enough provide for poorer nations.
Its gross revenue margin is estimated to be someplace round 80%, or maybe slightly extra. Pfizer, in the meantime, claims its revenue margin for the jab is within the high-20%. Pfizer defends its profiteering, partially, by saying it pays for wanted analysis and improvement, however let’s do not forget that taxpayers paid for the entire analysis and improvement that went into this jab within the first place.
As defined within the video, the preliminary improvement of the Pfizer jab was achieved by BioNTech, which acquired thousands and thousands of euros of public funding from each the German authorities and the European Union. Primarily, the general public paid for its improvement after which received fleeced whereas Pfizer makes out like a bandit.
By the tip of 2021, Pfizer had manufactured 2 billion doses of the jab. However whereas the corporate claims it’s devoted to offer “equitable and inexpensive entry,” solely 16% had gone to lower- and middle-income nations, and just one% to the poorest of countries.
In 2022, Pfizer intends to supply 4 billion doses. In line with Dispatches, the entire price of producing is someplace between 80 cents and $1.40 per dose. The most probably price is correct round $1.05. Pfizer disputes this, saying it “doesn’t replicate the true prices” of creating the jab, as this price doesn’t embrace the price of scaling up manufacturing efforts, world distribution and scientific trials.
The U.Ok., which pays the best worth for Pfizer’s jab, had on the finish of 2021 paid Pfizer an estimated £2.6 billion (about $3.5 billion) which, primarily based on the price of manufacturing, is considered about £2 billion (round $2.7 billion) greater than it ought to have paid, had the revenue margin been extra affordable.
Pfizer Unfold Misinformation About Rivals
In line with Dispatches, Pfizer can be answerable for spreading misinformation about rival COVID photographs, together with the AstraZeneca injection. A Canadian PowerPoint presentation despatched to medical professionals included a slide detailing alleged disadvantages of viral vector DNA injections (such because the AstraZeneca shot).
The slide states that viral vector DNA injections may trigger chromosomal integration and oncogenesis. In different phrases, the DNA may grow to be completely built-in in your genes, and will trigger most cancers. There was additionally a warning towards its use in immunocompromised sufferers.
Curiously sufficient, when requested, Pollard claims there’s no fact to any of these claims. So, “how did these claims come to be proven to well being professionals throughout Canada?” Dispatches asks. After some digging, they found the presentation was, partially, funded by Pfizer, and that the important thing speaker who gave the presentation had acquired Pfizer funding.
Extra particularly, the portion of the presentation that listed disadvantages of viral vector DNA merchandise was written by a staff that included no less than one member who had beforehand labored in Pfizer’s vaccine division.
When requested concerning the dangers related to vaccine misinformation, Pollard says there are “large dangers,” as something that causes individuals to be hesitant about getting the shot may end up in them risking their lives.
So, seeing how Pfizer seems to have undermined a competing COVID jab, aren’t they then responsible of inflicting vaccine hesitancy and placing lives in danger? And, seeing how Pollard claims there’s no fact to any of these warnings, doesn’t that recommend Pfizer put individuals’s lives in danger for no different purpose than to maximise their very own income? Pfizer, after all, denies having had any affect over the creation of the presentation.
Remember, I strongly disagree with Dispatches’ claims that the Pfizer shot is a life-saving drug. I additionally disagree with Pollard’s declare that vaccine hesitancy is doubtlessly life-threatening. What I’m stating right here is the hypocrisy.
Whereas Dispatches valiantly tries to color Pfizer as a world savior, albeit a grasping one, I imagine all COVID jabs are a harmful rip-off which might be doing much more hurt to humanity than good. They’re actually raking in unprecedented income from the struggling and dying of untold thousands and thousands.
Had been Corners Lower?
After giving the viewers a blanket assurance that the Pfizer jab is “clearly secure and efficient,” Dispatches goes on to assessment whistleblower testimony13 from Brooke Jackson, a scientific analysis coordinator and former regional director of Ventavia Analysis Group, a analysis group charged with testing Pfizer’s COVID jab at a number of websites in Texas.
Jackson, who labored on Pfizer’s Part 3 COVID jab trial within the fall of 2020, claims she discovered proof of trial knowledge being falsified. She was additionally shocked to comprehend that sufferers within the scientific trials had been unblinded.
Their charts contained data exhibiting whether or not they received the actual shot or a placebo, which is a severe breach. “In on a regular basis I’ve been doing analysis, I’ve by no means seen the kind of misconduct that I noticed [at Ventavia],” Jackson says.
She repeatedly knowledgeable her superiors about considerations over poor laboratory administration, affected person security and knowledge integrity points — all of which had been ignored. She additionally tried to get in contact with the Pfizer web site liaison, however was by no means in a position to communicate to him instantly. Finally, she filed a grievance with the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration, and that too was ignored. To prime it off, she was fired.
In response to Dispatches inquiries, Pfizer claims they carried out “a radical investigation” into Jackson’s claims, that “actions had been taken to right and remediate” the issues she’d reported, and that no proof was discovered that will “invalidate the info or jeopardize the integrity of the examine.” Ventavia additionally claims they discovered Jackson’s accusations to be “unsubstantiated,” and the FDA insists it has “full confidence” in Pfizer’s knowledge.
Why Are We Experimenting on Youngsters?
Traditionally, kids have been excluded from early human trials, and for good purpose. The potential of hurt is nice it doesn’t matter what the drug, and right here we’re speaking a couple of never-before-used gene switch know-how that hasn’t even been examined on animals.
Worse but, a whole bunch of 1000’s of American adults have skilled very severe and debilitating uncomfortable side effects. Greater than 10,300 have died post-jab, as of January 21, 2022, within the U.S. territories alone.14 Why is the FDA risking our kids?
As talked about, we already know kids are basically at zero danger of dying from COVID. They may check constructive. They may develop signs, however they get by way of it identical to they get by way of the widespread chilly or flu. There’s no purpose to jeopardize their long-term well being with a COVID jab. They don’t want it, and due to this fact ANY danger of the jab, irrespective of how small, is unconscionable and unacceptable.
Happily, many dad and mom, together with many who received the shot themselves, aren’t prepared to gamble their younger ones. By mid-December 2021, just below 20% of youngsters between the ages of 5 and 11 within the U.S. had acquired their first COVID shot, with vaccination charges amongst city kids being twice that of these residing in rural areas.15
Nonetheless, since then, the injection fee has quickly dropped off. In Florida, the weekly injection fee amongst kids 5 to 11 was 55,548 in mid-November 2021, when the EUA for this age group went into impact. By the final week of January 2022, that weekly fee had dwindled to 10,084.16 I might sincerely hope that because the EUA is prolonged all the best way right down to 6-month-olds, dad and mom merely refuse their kids’s participation on this ongoing experiment.